|
|
|
|
|
by AtlasBarfed
2311 days ago
|
|
I vehemently and violently disagree! The average project achieves 1.5 of the triples. Here are the true constraints though: - Schedule
- Meets Requirements
- Cost
- Process
- Usefulness/Polish Yes, usefulness and meets requirements aren't the same thing, and anyone who has done the madness of large scale enterprise software will be nodding their heads. What really bogs down most software projects is that "quality" means different things to different actors in projects. Project Managers want to follow process and meet political goals. Users want usefulness, polish, and efficiency. Directors/management want requirements fulfilled they dictate (often reporting and other junk that don't add to ROI). And that I like to say "pick two" |
|