|
|
|
|
|
by AndrewUnmuted
2315 days ago
|
|
That's actually not a claim you could make. You don't know why the poster has, thus far, not addressed "the evidence in the article." That said, I am also seeking out this "evidence," of which you write. The Fidelis article you linked to did nothing but show some similarity in naming schemes, binary packaging conventions, and code style. And, it's building a case upon the precedent of prior "evidence," which we cannot see for ourselves either. We all know that the FBI could put all of its evidence in a GitHub repo, along with a README.md that explains how to run the code that offers the substantiated proof of their claims. The problem is, they don't have any. |
|