Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by strictnein 2312 days ago
Corporate personhood is a centuries old idea. It is what enables you to sign a contract with a company, for example.

As a counter example that shows they are still not fully "people": a corporation cannot adopt a child or get married.
1 comments
jessaustin 2312 days ago
It is what enables you to sign a contract with a company, for example.

We'd be better off if we couldn't do this. Predatory credit would disappear.

link
stordoff 2312 days ago
How do I order something if I can't make a contract with a company? It's a contract of sale.
link
jessaustin 2312 days ago
It doesn't have to be. Fraud is still a crime. If I send the firm a BTC and they don't send me back a BTC worth of goods, how long will they remain in business?
link
kube-system 2312 days ago
Well yeah, an absolute ton of things would disappear if we essentially made every company a sole proprietorship.
link
jessaustin 2312 days ago
That's another option, but it's not what I was talking about. If corporations exist, then sure we can let them create contracts among themselves.
link
kube-system 2311 days ago
Most corporations would have a very difficult (i.e. impossible) time tracking down all of their owners for a signature on those contracts.

That's why we allow them to be a legal person. So Comcast can sign a contract to purchase a new toner cartridge, rather than requiring a signature from each owner of each of their 4.5 billion shares outstanding.

link
strictnein 2312 days ago
The entire financial system would disappear.
link
jessaustin 2312 days ago
Wouldn't most of that be handled by corporations making agreements among themselves? I don't think "the entire financial system" is really based on hooking individual people on unsustainable credit.
link
Ajedi32 2312 days ago
So if I want to buy a house, but don't have enough to cover 100% of the cost in a single down payment I'm just SOL?

I guess I could rent instead, except that would require a contract as well. I get the impression you haven't really thought this through.

link
kube-system 2311 days ago
No, the entire financial system is based on companies being able to enter into contracts directly, rather than requiring each of their owners to be individually involved in every transaction.
link
Ajedi32 2312 days ago
As would employment. (I can't be employed by a company if I can't sign a contract with it.)
link
jessaustin 2312 days ago
This isn't so. Most employment is at-will. This works fine, because lots of laws govern what employers may do to employees, and anyway slavery is illegal so any employee may leave at any time. 95% of any employment contract is various attempts to get around those legal protections for the employee.

This is an especially pernicious case of the normal Stockholm Syndrome we see whenever the special status of corporations is challenged. No firm is 100% robots yet. If we withdraw our consent, they have to raise wages and improve working conditions until we relent.

link
Ajedi32 2312 days ago
The law only protects you from actual crimes. There are hundreds of other small provisions which have to be negotiated as part of a contract to be enforceable from a legal perspective.

This is especially true for freelancers, who don't have a single employer and are instead usually paid for deliverables as specified in a contract. Being able to quit anytime doesn't help if you've already spent weeks or months working on a project and never get paid because the company decides on a whim that they don't need your deliverable anymore.

link