|
|
|
|
|
by nihonium
2305 days ago
|
|
I completely agree. If prediction algorithms properly implemented, the Uber crash could be avoided. I think the next step after proper visual prediction is interpreting the noise around. For example, a human can hear the ambulance siren approaching and slow down in a junction without seeing the vehicle. I think sound interpretation is very important especially in city driving. |
|
Staying alert on watch is something that nearly every solider, security guard, sailor, will have to do. Where you basically stare into the dark in case someone comes.
There are a number of ways to mitigate the inevitable failure of attention:
* Having a parter;
* Doing short shifts (change with partner);
* Very simple non-distracting tasks - like reading out to your parter a figure at a glance.
You certainly should not:
* Be on your own;
* Have a mobile phone on you (all screens should be locked away while moving).
It's so fucking arrogant that Uber didn't care to implement the most obvious risk mitigation. The cost of an additional person on watch is negligible compared to the cost of their self driving care program. My gut feeling is Uber simply misled regulators with how developed their self driving car program is, so it could continue to mislead investors.