|
|
|
|
|
by kbumsik
2312 days ago
|
|
> ... and possibly saving sensitive personal in- formation [32, 55, 38, 26]. They left 4 related articles in the publication please read the actual paper before criticizing it. > and widely disproven I personally never heard of it. Any evidence? |
|
While I do appreciate that the cited sources in their paper, I would have appreciated actual information security papers rather than mainstream media articles.