|
|
|
|
|
by ikeboy
2311 days ago
|
|
No, I'm not. OP is substantively wrong on their claims, not just semantically. The difference between illegal and legal is not semantic. You're the one defending someone who's wrong. Also, I'm not defending the fraud, but the (legality) of the parts of this that aren't fraudulent. I understand that you believe it's ok to smear anyone as long as they've done something else you dislike. I disagree. |
|
Ok chief. I'll wait to see the outcome of the legal case. That has 10000x more weight than a random internet commenter that appears to be continually injecting FUD.
Also, just incase you missed my prior comment: Don't defend fraud artists.