|
|
|
|
|
|
by purp
5596 days ago
|
|
|
<snark>You'd prefer C?</snark> Seriously, though, how would you improve the solution? What would decrease the likelihood of serving the wrong asset or no asset at all? I'm sure there are other interesting solutions to this problem, but are they as complete and in some measurable way better? Disclaimer: I work with Jared and enjoy the benefit of the solution as described. |
|
|