Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by carlosdp 2311 days ago
Maybe, but there's no reason for it to send any audio anywhere while it's parsing ultrasound, so not a privacy problem.
2 comments

Until software is compromised or simply has a bug that stream audio somewhere.
In which case it could have just turned on the microphone itself?
Software that already is listening has more vectors of attack to put it simply. I'm not a fan of features that compromise privacy and security for the sake of convenience.
That's really nonsensical. Nothing about using an audio input makes code more vulnerable. The interface is always there if the hardware is.
If software that continuously listens to the microphone is normal this makes it harder to keep track of apps that should not do that.