[onceUponADime]

Ah, question, would a veto by people you named reliable on any large scale move, after your decision has been proofen impaired once, be a acceptable solution for society?

[alehul]

From an American perspective, my first thought would be "how could this power, vested in the state, be abused by an authoritarian government?"

[onceUponADime]

Why vested into the state? Its three of your fellow citizens? You choose?

[alehul]

> after your decision has been proofen impaired once

Who decides that your decision has been proven impaired, and how?

[heartbeats]

I'm not posting this to be a pedant, but I had a bit of trouble understanding it.

>Ah, so a question: if your decision-making abilities have been shown to be impaired once, would giving veto powers on any large-scale decision to people you have previously appointed, be an acceptable solution for society?

[saddestcatever]

...like a personal board of directors.