|
|
|
|
|
|
by EGreg
2310 days ago
|
|
|
Do you admit this statement is wrong? With large ranges, even if you exclude a power of 10 in the upper bound, it does not change the 11.11% chance of each digit being the first digit. The empirical test is cherrypicked also. If you don’t admit this then there is really no point to continue. |
|
|