|
|
|
|
|
by dathinab
2322 days ago
|
|
Because Google had a big advantage: - that started the race later slowing the to put certain "new" tech in it from the get to go instead of trying to retrofit it later - Google had far more money for engineers and marketing. - Google has a kinda unfair advantage through Android and Google Search. Especially starting later after some technological shifts happend allowed them to get a technological advantage over Firefox for some time, combined with the much better image they had in the past and Android/Google search it was pretty hard for them not to become the dominant browser. The question is why thinks didn't shift noticably in recent years? This brings the problem that the futures doesn't look too good given the power Google now has to just push through theire stuff and given that there has been a bunch of cases where certain Google program _seem_ to have been intentionally "optimized" to be fast on chrome but _only_ on chrome and no other browser... Edited for spelling fixes. |
|