The orbital angular momentum of the spinning fermions neutrinos has to be taken into account. You can not simply add up fermion spins. Read about the proton spin crisis.
I think there is a funtamental test here how the neutron gets its magnetic moment. Based on RLM the spinning neutrinos have electric dipoles and magnetic moments how to neutrino magnetic moments scale up with relativistic mass? I could accept electric dipoles arising but how can you get the magnetic moment of a neutron which is 1.93μN almost twice the nuclear magneton.
Ok, there are many serious questions here, but really now, even with the proton crisis and all that stuff, how is the vagenas model useful ? There is no known mechanism for gravity in such scales, and he abuses relativity, assymetrical rotating gravitational objects emit gravitational radiation so they are not stable, the neutrino mass he uses is his own choice since we don't know it yet and there is so much experimental stuff from the detection of quarks and the standard model that i dont really think it can really match up to them. In the end with the way he uses relativity and neutrino masses you can deduct any number you want with slight changes of one or the other, how is that helpful ? We already know all the stuff he tries to deduce. Also there is the experimental verification of Higgs and all that..
He plugs the masses for quarks and then tells you that the quarks are actually relativistic neutrinos nothing new invented.So he keeps the same attractive black hole force and based on that he calculates the hiĝgs W bosons masses. In the proton the electron in the middle contributes only about 1/2 a Mev the rest up to almost a Gev are made by the spinning neutrinos.He just added gravity to the subatomic world. And told you that the strong nuclear force is actually gravitational.