Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by pjc50 2315 days ago
See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22288645 - if the correct number is $0.00473 that's close to half of Spotify's revenue for streaming that in the first place.
2 comments

For Bandcamp it’s at least 85% based on the fact that their cut is 15 to 10%. Less than half looks pretty bad in comparison I would say.

The _only thing_ Spotify is doing here is distribution. That is some brutal split if you ask me. The only thing holding them back from converting their user numbers into a more silly-level profit margin, like a proper Silicon Valley SaaS, is the power of a handful of major record labels, which in turn hold the artists by the balls.

As in most online industries nowadays, the ones doing the real work get the smallest piece of the pie. The best course of action for them would be to decentralize, which is entirely possible, but deep pockets need to kickstart that process and there is zero incentive for them to do that.

Distribution is "real work". Artists can publish under their own label, but finding and reaching an audience is hard work.
The fact that it's half of Spotify's revenue isn't a justification, it's essentially an admission that the whole model was never a particularly viable one for recording artists.
It also has to be viable for the users paying for it, or they'll go back to taping it off the radio.
Of all the threats mentioned in this thread, this one sounds the least dangerous
I've never bought an album in my life. I like Spotify. Millions do. People want to pay for choice, not pay to commit to a single album.