Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by d-d 2318 days ago
That's legalistic though.

If you're withholding the fruits of labor from workers because "too bad, bro; you signed the paper" then you're not really trying to be kind to anyone. You just want to be rich and appear to be kind.

2 comments

>> withholding fruits of labor from worker

How much of the worker output actually is his personal accomplishment, and how much is synergy effect coming from the fact that the employer gave them tools, materials, support of other workers, standard operating procedures, know-how? Therefore not all "fruits of labor" actually belong to a worker.

Respecting human choices and agency is 'legalistic'? That's quite the reductionist leap.