|
|
|
|
|
by sverhagen
2327 days ago
|
|
With (some) television sets in mind that popularized (for, um, me at least) the picture-in-picture term as one channel of video on top of another channel of video, it feels weird that the term is here used when only a minimum of 1 videos is involved... |
|
- the mechanism is about the same: the video stays in the corner
- the term ‘picture in picture’ is already familiar to people, from TVs
...so the term is generalized. Happens a lot. If the feature gets popular and the term sticks around, decades later people might search the web for ‘why is it called PiP when it's not what it does’. We can even imagine that zero videos may be involved by then (though unlikely―there are other terms for that.)