Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by chrisBob 2325 days ago
Shoes of the winning marathoners tells you what brand is sponsoring the runners. The sponsorship has a tremendous impact on who wins major races. The shoes don't have that much of an impact.
4 comments

Wrong. Nikes have been a straight up sensation the past couple of years, and in particular the past 6 months.

Go to any race. The field is STACKED with people running vaporflys. I see it at our running club. People are suddenly paying their own money to buy the same Nike shoe, when in the past people used kind of whatever they preferred.

Tune in to the olympic marathon trials February 29. I bet the vast majority of the field will be wearing the exact same shoe.

And not just because they're being paid to. They're setting records. Records are falling unusually fast, and by substantial margins.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-athletics-shoe-factbox/fa...

That's just dead wrong. Multiple independent researchers have verified that the latest Nike running shoes are more efficient than any competitors. In these distance running events even a tiny improvement can be the difference between 1st place and 11th. The lion's share of prize money and recognition goes to the top 3; everyone else barely gets mentioned.
Clearly you haven’t run any marathons recently. Most serious runners with money to spend are now using nike by my observation
Read your parent commenter's linked articles. Your statement is demonstrably false.