|
|
|
|
|
|
by bumby
2332 days ago
|
|
|
>Typically reviewers want to see shiny new ideas so if anything it over emphasizes innovation and discourages incremental improvements. I know publications fetishize novelty, but wasn’t there research showing a high percentage of publication is either non-replicable or derivative and subsequently of little value once you remove auto-citations? |
|
|