[feynmanistheman]

Is any objection that questions the emphasis of "modern law" on private property Marxism?

Georgism, which most people would not define as Marxist, has similar objections to the origins of land ownership, and every defendant against eminent domain claims to be victim of some Soviet dystopia. The book seems to be making a firmly legal realist critique on the implementation of these principles of private property that undergird our society, rather than attacking the principles in general.

[rayiner]

No, but this particular article is Marxist and self-consciously so. As to Georgism—it is predicated on private ownership of property.