|
|
|
|
|
|
by smileypete
2331 days ago
|
|
|
Thanks for that, some of the writing around the time is well worth a read too: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2003/05/12/selective-inte... "In Congress, a senior legislative aide said, “Some members are beginning to ask and to wonder, but cautiously.” For now, he told me, “the members don’t have the confidence to say that the Administration is off base.” He also commented, “For many, it makes little difference. We vanquished a bad guy and liberated the Iraqi people. Some are astute enough to recognize that the alleged imminent W.M.D. threat to the U.S. was a pretext. I sometimes have to pinch myself when friends or family ask with incredulity about the lack of W.M.D., and remind myself that the average person has the idea that there are mountains of the stuff over there, ready to be tripped over. The more time elapses, the more people are going to wonder about this, but I don’t think it will sway U.S. public opinion much. Everyone loves to be on the winning side.” EDIT: and don't forget the tubes... https://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/08/world/threats-responses-i... https://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/03/washington/us/the-nuclear... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraqi_aluminum_tubes |
|
|