Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by sappapp 2326 days ago
Yeah, you're right! The Buttigieg campaign should have withheld that 100K until Shadow successfully rigged the Iowa caucus.
2 comments

What is the endgame here in this conspiracy?

That Buttigieg pays $100,000 for software he doesn't need to cover up a bribe used to "rig" the preliminary results of the caucus? If that's the case, wouldn't it backfire horribly once the paper ballots get manually tabulated? Especially since that would probably happen around the time of the next (NH?) primary. A story like that ("Buttigieg didn't actually win in Iowa!") would totally derail any momentum (since the actual # of delegates in Iowa is fairly insignificant, about 1% of the total, my understanding is that the main value of the Iowa caucuses is to construct media narratives)

What $100,000 is that?