|
|
|
|
|
|
by gus_massa
2324 days ago
|
|
|
I can't find it in the paper. In which page it is? This is a huge. Spin rules have a very strong experimental and theoretical support. In this case they should write that in at the top of the article with all-caps, red color and blink. It is almost as big as breaking the conservation of charge. (Almost.) --- The condensation at the big bang makes no sense, because the particles are created and destroyed constantly. But this requires some handwaving and estimations. The use of gravity here is very dubious, but this requires some handwaving and estimations. Try to read more about the "standard model" and about this, and compare the results. A good question is why there are two missing particles in the figure "B.1"? |
|
|