| I saw "relativistic gravitational force between neutrinos" and red flags went up. I've not read the article, just the abstract. Doing a bit more of a look on the RLM, I found this[1] where they (mis)write the relation between inertial and rest mass. Specifically the gamma^3 factor ... I've been out of physics for more than 20 years, so it's possible that there has been some new development since my Ph.D. Though 2 additional factors of gamma in special relativity aren't likely. Color me ... skeptical. I did follow their Einstein paper reference[2] to see if I had missed something. I didn't. I don't understand the origin of their 2 extra gammas in eqn 1 of the first reference. The paper abstract appears to be a continuation of that work. From what I could determine, they need the gamma^3 term for their arguments, but it doesn't come from Einstein's paper as they claimed. Again, I could be missing something, but I don't think I am. [1] https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/738/1/0... [2] http://fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ |
It appears the current article is claiming the the inertial / gravitational mass of certain particles is gamma^3 times the rest mass of relativistic neutrinos that comprise them. Or something.