Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by xg15 2325 days ago
I'm assuming you mean "population decline due to death of old age and more empowerment not to have children".

Even then, this would only work until the population has shrunk to a certain point. Then what?

Maybe a more useful way forward would be to question if we need perpetual growth at all.

1 comments

That's the type the article is talking about. But it could also mean starvation, disease, war, or genocide. The mechanism doesn't change the math.
Indeed, and if it's necessary, then it's necessary, right?