|
|
|
|
|
|
by cs702
2334 days ago
|
|
|
As regards #3, I agree: the more eyes who see this unconfirmed claim, the better. That's the main reason I upvoted the OP. A great outcome would be if reputable scientists see this on HN or Twitter or learn about it through colleagues, and subsequently refute it or dismiss it as bad science. |
|
|
Isn't it a waste of those eyes' time if it turns out to be false? When there are plenty of confirmed things they could be reading?