[SketchySeaBeast]

So if it's not extraordinary it's still going to require evidence, which without peer review we still pretty much have none.

[gamegod]

This is evidence, but it requires corroboration from other evidence. Peer review doesn't provide additional evidence - it's just a sober second opinion that lends credence (or not) to the proposed evidence and interpretation.

Just wanted to clarify the language here.

[SketchySeaBeast]

Totally right - and thank you for the clarification in language.