|
|
|
|
|
by criddell
2329 days ago
|
|
The market is all the places the devices are sold. So global makes sense. If you define the market as San Francisco then Apple might have a monopoly. But that feels a little like market gerrymandering. Even if you were going to restrict to just the US, Apple still sells fewer than 50% of the phones. |
|
> The market is all the places the devices are sold.
Certainly US regulators / courts don't purport to have jurisdiction over foreign markets, agreed? The aforementioned EU case against Microsoft was about the EU market alone.