|
|
|
|
|
by ceejayoz
2339 days ago
|
|
The argument is that something the size and complexity of the JWST has never been attempted, which leaves a lot of Rumsfeld's famous "unknown unknowns" it's unfair to saddle the contractor with. There really needs to be a middle-ground on cost-plus contracts; something that allows for unanticipated issues to be dealt with, but punishes shoddy work or insanely silly lowball bids. https://www.seattletimes.com/business/boeing-aerospace/shodd... > In a vibration test of the telescope earlier this year in California by prime contractor Northrop Grumman, dozens of loose fasteners — some 70 pieces in all — came off. A few pieces are still missing and could well be inside the observatory. The locknuts were not tightened properly before the test, according to a report by the board. This sort of thing (IIRC, this individual issue cost $150M) should come directly out of the contractor's profits. |
|