|
|
|
|
|
|
by andrew_n
2331 days ago
|
|
|
A typical UML-bashing article/comment doesn’t suggest some potentially superior alternative, but takes the “everything is awful” stance. The text of the article reads in that same vein, but given that the title is “Monoliths are the Future” I think the author’s original intent was to describe the advantages of monoliths and point out that microservices have advantages only in relatively rare cases. Too bad they made the article about microservices instead of monoliths. Sounds to me like a good opportunity for the author to write a followup post. |
|
|