[ars]

If the Dr. wants to see the patient in 30 days then they setup an appointment for that.

I don't understand why you think the length of a prescription controls the appointments. It doesn't, it has nothing whatsoever to do with that.

[throwaway_tech]

>It doesn't, it has nothing whatsoever to do with that

Yes, the patient could pick up the phone and schedule another appointment, or the doctor could call to try to schedule another appointment in the meantime. You are missing the point...in practice those appointments don't get rescheduled.

The Doctors and insurers know this, which is why the Doctor tries to do 30 day scripts for at risk patients so they can be closely monitored, and its why the insurer attempts to change 30 day therapies to 90 day because they know the patient won't schedule an appointment in the meantime and that saves the insurer money.

Anyway its clear you see nothing wrong with an insurer interfering with a doctor's practice of medicine...or the other part you keep glossing over that is the insurer dropping doctors from their networks (i.e. patients losing their doctor) when the doctors don't follow the insurers requests for changes to therapies.

[ars]

> because they know the patient won't schedule an appointment

Such a patient isn't going to correctly take their medication either, 30 days or not.

> the other part you keep glossing over that is the insurer dropping doctors from their networks

Yah, because that's not actually true.

Insurance companies do a lot of bad stuff, but you seem to have invented a whole new class of things that they just don't do.

There is no bonus for 30 day to 90 conversion. There is only a lower co-pay for the member.

[throwaway_tech]

>Such a patient isn't going to correctly take their medication either, 30 days or not.

Exactly that is why the doctor specifically writes a 30 day so they come back in and can check their numbers.

>Insurance companies do a lot of bad stuff, but you seem to have invented a whole new class of things that they just don't do.

When you hear the term consolidation of the healthcare market this is what they are talking about. There are numerous lawsuits right now by doctors against insurers for dropping them, illegally, from their networks and sending their patients to new providers/practices that are owned by the insurers. You can find any number of those lawsuits, if you cared, but here is an article on the practice of insurers buying providers (to control all aspects of their costs), you have insurance A, odds are you are only able to go to a doctor practice/hospital owned by the insurer.

https://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20180602/NEWS/18060...

>There is no bonus for 30 day to 90 conversion

You are wrong, and it is clear you have never even heard of Medication Therapy Management (MTM) or OutcomesMTM. Walk into any big pharmacy (walmart, cvs, walgreens) and ask the pharmacist about OutcomesMTM and MTM generally. Or use this link to a OutcomesMTM report and learn about it http://www.outcomesmtm.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/2016MT...

>"Today, more than half of U.S. pharmacies are active in OutcomesMTM programs, earning revenue for their clinical services while helping healthcare payors reach their goals."

>Each year, OutcomesMTM recognizes pharmacies and pharmacy chain organizations with exceptional performance in delivering MTM services. Top MTM Center and Top Chain awards are based on the organization’s overall effectiveness in delivering CMRs and resolving drug therapy problems through TIPs