|
|
|
|
|
by stochastician
2334 days ago
|
|
Comments like this always make me sad. Not just because I disagree with them (I do!) or that I think they are claiming certainty about facts in dispute (I think they are ! [1, 2] ) but because they make no mention of trade-offs. We can vehemently disagree about these things, get our information from different sources, and advocate for different policies, but hopefully we can all agree that there _would_ be tradeoffs? What might be the downsides to the proposed approach ? Do we think this would result in reduced innovation? In fewer potential cures? [1] https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2019/05/28/wh...
[2] https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2014/11/11/ma... |
|