|
|
|
|
|
|
by chalst
5600 days ago
|
|
|
I agree with peer review as a criterion for being a reliable source, and that you need reliable sources for notability. But the other criteria are silly. Is Strachey's non-mainstream but very influential GPM notable? It has only one journal article about it, with a paltry 65 Google Scholar cites, and the other articles that mention it are all mostly concerned with something else. |
|
|