|
|
|
|
|
by coliveira
2331 days ago
|
|
It is very easy to point at a company that is extremely successful today and say that it was "just a matter of investing in AAPL". The difficult is to know which company is the good one at the IPO. Thousands of seemingly great companies have failed during the last decades. Moreover, 30 years ago AAPL was a failing company. I don't think there is anyone with good sense that bought AAPL at the IPO and held that investment in their portfolio during that period. Less so with MSFT, but even MSFT lost 80% of its value in 2001. I don't think anyone wise would keep their fortune on MSFT, unless required by law. If you read the "millionaire next door", you'll see that they made this money by saving, not by (just) investing in the market. |
|
No, it was 50%. It's up around 400% since the bottom.
> The difficult is to know which company is the good one at the IPO
It's fine if you don't want to invest because of the risk. But to then say it's unfair that others who do take the risk get the rewards is ... unreasonable.