|
|
|
|
|
by notlukesky
2343 days ago
|
|
The ultimate issue with all these studies is the sample bias. How did they source the independent SaaS companies (there are over 40 thousand plus, follow power laws and most are economically duds). All samples are biased but there are methods of “correcting” the bias. Historical errors are legion: https://www.math.upenn.edu/~deturck/m170/wk4/lecture/case2.h... By the way the key takeaway from this post is that you can make more money driving for Uber than starting an independent SaaS business. You have to be irrational to start an independent SaaS business (applicable to all startups as well). In fact the only folk who benefit from independent SaaS are the supplier food chain. Levi’s was the main beneficiary of the gold rush. The SaaS conference organizers seem to be among the beneficiaries of the SaaS “gold rush”. |
|
The only way for this not to sound pretty promising (without getting into sample bias) is if you live in Bay Area.