|
|
|
|
|
|
by pdonis
2342 days ago
|
|
|
> What prevents someone from adding syntactic sugar f (x y) for (f x y)? Because (cons 1 (cons 2 (cons 3 nil))) is a list and f (x y) isn't. You could put parens around the latter to make it (f (x y)), but then you might as well save a pair of parens and just write (f x y). |
|
|