| Tesla kills babies
hncynic 1 minute ago The original source (posted from the comments): http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=626065 hncynic 1 minute ago > " After some research about the potential implications of being a woman in a Tesla, the first thing Tesla carmaker said was ‘We can do it, but we do the opposite.’” What does it mean to have an attractive woman in a supercharger with an attractive female face that doesn't have a baby attached? hncynic 1 minute ago I think the article needs to be updated to explain what happened here. As in, Tesla lost a few babies to the first one (the car was still in the hands of two babies) so it was a very minor factor. But what happened to the last one would take a very long time. The title is a bit misleading. The Tesla was an individual that was given birth in a manner that prevented them from getting it. They didn't take away the babies from the Model S as well. They took away the babies in the Model S's hands and made it a minor factor, including the fact that the car broke down on the front of the vehicle. The Tesla's only reply is if the Model S would not have had any special features. In my opinion it should have given more minor facts. |