I can vouch for Countly ( https://github.com/countly ) which is open source, supports a few different platforms (web, iOS, Android), and has a nice administrative web interface.
The web SDK also supports collection of client-side JavaScript errors, which is neat for tracking down bugs and things which might harm user experience.
> We are keeping this version open-source, forever, and committing to maintain it. We also have a business to run, and while we love open-source, it isn't paying our bills (and Fathom takes a lot of work from 2 people to keep going) and we're not a charity.
> If this repo was full of contributions and other folks pitching in, this would be a different story, but it's not—which is totally fine and accepted. But, since we want to keep going with Fathom, we have to separate V1 and V2 so we can make it sustainable. Otherwise we'd have to abandon it (which serves no one).
> If you truly want your complaint heard, maybe contribute to what you're complaining about (financially, time, effort, etc). My wife always tells me that I'm not allowed to gripe unless I'm also taking action.
Kind of a nice answer. Their comment about contributing is not really valid, I'm not going to contribute to something they have already solved and not released to open source. They already have the answer. And I understand the fact that open source is incredibly difficult to make money and maintaining it sucks. But just stop being open source and be another analytic company. Trying to pretend you are both and want contributions to things you've already written in your private repo doesn't work.
I think we read it differently. In my view this is as about as nice as one can be:
> We are keeping this version open-source, forever, ...
Here they are committing to keeping their existing Open Source around instead of taking their toys and go home.
> If this repo was full of contributions and other folks pitching in, this would be a different story, but it's not—which is totally fine and accepted.
I think they aren't asking for contributions to v2 but rather for contributions to v1 which they are committed to keeping Open Source. But even then they acknowledge that users are free to use it without contributing in any way.
The open-source (self-hosted) version of Fathom is dead. The only commits they have been pushing to it in the last 12 months have been upsells for their closed-source & centralized paid offering.
Agreed. They were super nice on their GitHub issues about removing cookies as a requirement (required on mobile) and then it was released to non open source. Don't use Fathom if you don't want to pay. I made that mistake for home projects.
The web SDK also supports collection of client-side JavaScript errors, which is neat for tracking down bugs and things which might harm user experience.