|
|
|
|
|
|
by nhamann
5604 days ago
|
|
|
Please correct me if I'm misreading you here, but it appears that your "counter" is incorrect. The GP claims that (IP laws implies lack of innovation). You present a single example of (No IP laws & no innovation). However, the GP did not claim that a lack of IP laws is sufficient for innovation, only that it is necessary. |
|
|