|
|
|
|
|
by darkmighty
2346 days ago
|
|
Microlens arrays, for all intents and purposes of consuming and recording media (for human consumption), are essentially equivalent to ideal phased array optics (while having spacing much larger than phased array usual requirements). We perceive light non-coherently, phase information is lost to our eyes; microlens arrays suffice to reproduce a light field sans phase effects[1] -- that includes the perception of most phenomena that are affected by light coherence, like oil on water or viewing laser experiments (not totally sure, but I don't think there are experiments that can't be reproduced by geometric-optical light fields that don't rely on coherent measurement?; maybe some interference phenomena though?). There are practical problems with the technology though, as light sources we can currently make have some minimum size limitations, and incoherent optical behavior starts to degrade at very small lens size (at or below micron scale I guess). [1] You could probably create a good approximate phased array optics with led-scale (~ 10 micron scale) coherent lasers as light sources, but again I don't see any application that's not scientific |
|
Perhaps actual phased array optics wouldn't have that issue?
For those just entering this thread, [1] is an example of a rudimentary microlens array display.
[1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGJe0AdszJg