|
|
|
|
|
by mandelbrotwurst
2346 days ago
|
|
No, I was being a bit facetious. My counterpoint was simply that as you just stated it's clearly excessive and that you know it is a lot even without additional context and so by extension it's not accurate to say that the number is "meaningless". |
|
If I could edit my comment, I might say something more accurate, like "trying to evaluate this number without more context is not useful."