Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by aspaceman 2345 days ago
This isn’t true at all. Many projects even say “we won’t accept PRs” in their README.

When the code is being used internally at Microsoft, it makes even more sense they wouldn’t take PRs.
2 comments
mroche 2345 days ago
There's been a request going for several years now to disable Pull Requests on GitHub[0]. They allow project maintainers to disable Issues, they should also be allowed to disable PRs rather than use automation to close any opened PR. Other SCM products (e.g. GitLab) offer the ability to make PRs available only to project members, or disable them completely.

[0] https://github.com/dear-github/dear-github/issues/84

link
NewsAware 2345 days ago
Which is exactly what I suggested - avoid strife over mismatched expectations with a one liner. I would take your first paragraph to actually strengthen my assumption that Kinder treatment of PRs is the norm and that's why the many projects you mention add that line.
link