|
|
|
|
|
by samatman
2342 days ago
|
|
Rust didn’t introduce this language, they adopted it. Memory safety has been called that as long as I’ve been programming. Using the antonym of safe was a natural move, though with the benefit of hindsight, `danger` would have been a better keyword. After all, good unsafe code isn’t unsafe! It is dangerous though, because it forgoes guarantees of memory and resource safety provided by the compiler. |
|