|
|
|
|
|
by eropple
2347 days ago
|
|
Oh no, they used CSS! Heaven forfend one delicately and with restraint use something supported in nine thousand, nine hundred and ninety-nine out of ten thousand browsers. Heaven forfend. A pox on their house. "Sets fonts" is misleading--the creator knows and must know that the default in virtually every browser is whatever dog's-breakfast default serif there is. (Yes, yes, "the browser can change it," because we all know that every user is an artisanal crafter of browser preferences and truly, deeply cares to do that instead of go to a site where somebody thought that through in its presentation.) It's not 1997 anymore. HTML is no longer a document markup language, it is an application-and-presentation toolkit, and whether or not you or I like it--I don't particularly, there are better ones--doesn't excuse doing bad work because we pretend users who happen to be fully congruent with ourselves want it. |
|