[itp]

Couple quick clarifications:

BFR isn't a name that's still in use. Poster you're responding to was correct in calling it Starship: "SpaceX's Starship spacecraft and Super Heavy rocket (collectively referred to as Starship)" (from https://www.spacex.com/starship).

Starship projects to be significantly less expensive than Falcon Heavy _or_ Falcon 9. With total reusability of both stages and a construction built toward little to no refurbish or rehab, the cost per launch is nearly completely dictated (order of magnitude) by fuel costs, and project to be ~$2 million. This is an order of magnitude reduction in $/kg over the Falcon 9.

https://www.space.com/spacex-starship-flight-passenger-cost-...

https://www.thespacereview.com/article/3740/1

[dr_orpheus]

The article you pointed to said that is would be $2 million that SpaceX would have to spend on each launch. That would not be the amount for someone to purchase a launch with that rocket. Considering Elon estimated that development would cost $5 billion to $10 billion [1], the cost of launch would likely be much higher based on recouping the intial development and manufacturing costs.

As a side note, I don't really believe the $2 million price tag either based on my own experiences. Mission specific planning/services/verification tend to push prices of launches 10s of millions of dollars above the "sticker prices" that SpaceX puts on their website.

Nothing against SpaceX, I am a fan of everything they have done to decrease launch costs. They have significantly changed the game in terms of lowering launch costs. But it is really hard to take Elon's wild numbers that he gives the press at face value.

[1] https://www.theverge.com/2018/9/18/17873332/spacex-elon-musk...