Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by alasdair_ 2354 days ago
> It is obvious that the deceased's contributions outweighed their perceived transgressions, else they would have been terminated.

Possibly. Another possibility is that no one wanted to be the one to fire a man with terminal cancer who presumably depended upon the health insurance provided by the company.

1 comments

He lived in England. Not a factor.
Why would that matter?
Health insurance is provided by NHS in England?