Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by maksimum 2343 days ago
Compared to __slots__ (also Python 3.7.4)

Using your definition of class X

  %timeit x.w()
  313 ns ± 18.3 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1000000 loops each)
Add __slots__

  class X:
    __slots__ = ('a')
    def w(z):
      a = z.a
      return a+a+a+a+a

  %timeit x.w()
  271 ns ± 7.13 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1000000 loops each)
About 14% less time.
1 comments

Your computer is evidently faster than my phone; how fast was y() for you?

Also you are missing a comma in your would-be tuple.

For what it's worth I got about 196 and 131 for the original y and w, and after adding __slots__ (with comma) I got 186 and 123.
The fact that the difference is 10ms and 8ms respectively suggests that the speedup of attribute access isn't what's showing up in your measurements. In one case we access the slot "a" once; in the other case we access it five times. How can that be a 20% difference?