Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by artmageddon 5605 days ago
In my experience, recruiters who set up at career fairs tend to do it wrong sometimes, too. I haven't been to a career fair since I graduated university in 2004, but there are reasons I stopped going to them.

1. Show Up. This is self-explanatory, right? On a number of occasions, a company would set up a table with a poster or two alongside a locked bin for people to drop their resumes in. I don't mind if a one-person booth steps out for a little bit for a snack or to use the restroom, but I've seen more than several booths totally unmanned during an entire fair. It puts a bad image on your company that you can't even bother to send an individual or two to represent your interests.

2. If you don't have positions open, don't show up. This might contradict point #1, but almost worse yet were people who were just there to collect resumes even though they didn't have jobs open at their company. It's just as stimulating as getting an email saying "We'll keep your resume on file." If you're not hiring, why am I talking to you?

3. On demanding absolute GPA minimums. I get that each company wants to hire the best and the brightest especially when hosting booths at university fairs, but honestly those who are expecting a certain GPA without giving any consideration to experience or what the candidate demonstrates in knowledge.. well, it makes you look like asses. I recall(read: I was bitter for a little while about) talking to a recruiter from a well respected financial company looking for developers. The first thing he asked me was my GPA, and after telling him it was about .08 points under their minimum cut-off, he simply handed my resume back and refused to talk to me. Joke's on them since I got hired at a larger one a little while after I graduated about a year later...

4. If you're a big company, send multiple people. Our time is just as valuable as yours, and I don't want to wait for 30 other people to each get done shooting their 4-minute breeze with you as the only person at your table. Having multiple people to talk to candidates helps everyone feel like the line is moving, and distracts me from having to mentally figure out how many other companies I could've talked to while I waited in your line. I understand it's not always possible since career fairs are pretty low on a company's day-to-day priority list, but nevertheless it should be taken into consideration.

5. Go beyond brochures I'm a literate person and I've probably already combed through your website. Talk to me about what you do, and what your experience with your company has been like. Smiling and handing me a brochure and hoping that I'll walk away isn't going to leave me with a memorable impression.

6. Free swag rules This isn't actually a bone to pick.. but having unique swag to give out is good PR. If you don't have anything it's perfectly fine, too. But people like free stuff :)

4 comments

> The first thing he asked me was my GPA, and after telling him it was about .08 points under their minimum cut-off, he simply handed my resume back and refused to talk to me.

They did you a big favour as that's a giant red flag. Visions of pointy-haired bosses and inscrutable bureaucracies flash through my mind.

From my experience here, I would add:

7. Don't just direct everyone to your web site. This ties in to some extent with #2. If you're not meeting the students, setting up interviews, holding info sessions, etc., then your physical presence is superfluous and distorts students' expectations of career fair.

8. Don't say you're looking for students from all majors. You won't get taken seriously. Maybe your company really does have openings in every field this school offers, but USPTO is the only employer I've seen who can even come close to justifying this claim.

It's also worth noting that students (here, at least) talk to each other about the recruiters they've encountered. Students remember really good recruiters and those who make serious faux pas.

Don't say you're looking for students from all majors

Why not? If you're smart and are interested in programming, it's quite possible that I am willing to "take a chance" on you. It doesn't really matter if you studied data structures or English literature; CS majors have as much experience writing real software as English majors do.

If you're really worried about students from "all majors" being unqualified, then it seems to me that the answer is requesting a small coding project ala FizzBuzz to seperate the wheat and the chaff. Those who can, do - those who can't... do something else.
Around here, students generally major in what they want to do for a career. It's not that a person isn't capable of doing things they didn't study -- they just aren't likely to be all that interested.
The reasons for some of these behaviours:

3) Imagine you have 10,000 more or less identical CVs, how do you propose to filter them in a cost efficient manner ? - GPA is a quick and dirty solution. Sure you might miss out on some good people, but that's always going to be the case with whichever criteria you use.

4) Sending an extra person for the day will cost a company around $1500. The handfull of students who aren't willing to hang around for a bit aren't worth that extra cost.

>>"I'm a literate person and I've probably already combed through your website. "

You'd be surprised. The vast majority of people haven't done any research on the exhibiting company at all. It's a real treat when they have visited the website! Unfortunately, not the norm.

Fair enough, I can see the frustration with that... and I do understand from you and the article that recruiters do have it tough, too.

I would usually pick out companies who I would want to talk to and research them a couple of days before the event. The key here is that I'm looking for something from the recruiter that I can't get from the website, be it an edge or further insight with experiences about the company. Simply repeating the company's mission statement and handing me the website equivalent on glossy paper isn't all that much of a help(this isn't too frequent a case but it's happened).

I agree that employer exhibitors have to be just as prepared! Our company treats it just like any trade show. And any good exhibitor will tell you that you need to have one specific goal to work towards. Without it, you're just the talking head with a brochure.