|
|
|
|
|
by ahnick
2352 days ago
|
|
Thanks for the cogent explanation. That actually makes a lot of sense to me. > A “permission” can only be something which you grant someone which 1. You are in a position to grant and 2. They would otherwise be not permitted to do. Did you pull this from somewhere? I would like to read more, if so. |
|
Thank you! A lot of this licensing stuff actually does make sense if you just look at it the right way.
> Did you pull this from somewhere? I would like to read more, if so.
Sorry, no. Just from many years of arguing about licensing on the net. For further reading, I would suggest this:
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html