|
|
|
|
|
by _jal
2348 days ago
|
|
If you're not involved in adversarial contract authoring, I don't get the appeal of the "what about this edge case" game. > Would the definition be based on possessing or owning? Given that nobody calls people renting apartments homeless, I think this self-answers. In any case, voluntarily being temporarily in a situation wherein one does not own property in not commonly confused with living on the street for reasons I believe to be fairly obvious. It has to do with that word "voluntarily". |
|
My mind often goes to the boundary cases because that is where the real differences occur at.
For social issues in general, I've seen enough cases of people stretching definitions and using selective definitions that are enough against the norm that the end statement made is purposefully misleading. You might say it is adversarial advertisement authoring.