[gwbas1c]

> Yes this is my understanding as well. He just needs to give access. He doesn't need to provide any infrastructure (which would be unfair to any homeowner)

Which makes me inherently distrustful of how the media portrays this article. What does "give access" mean?

I've encountered a narrow footpath path along a property line in Hawaii to "give access" that was mainly used by people in the neighborhood. If I remember correctly, both beachfront properties on either side had fences.

In San Diego, I encountered a narrow stairway between two condo buildings; but there were so many public parks and streets that came up to the beach that I didn't understand the point.

I'm not a lawyer, but could Vinod satisfy the law by having a narrow footpath along his property line?