|
|
|
|
|
by IGotThroughIt
2361 days ago
|
|
Makes total sense to have a worker well rested and happy (40 hours does that sufficiently well). Your submission works if it is a task such as programming. A programmer can finish their week's tasks in 3 days or less and you'd be fine with that. That's not most programmers though. Moreover, I have had other businesses where the time you pay for as an employer totally matters if you're to get an ROI. If I need you for 8 hours a day and there's an amount we've agreed on as compensation, then that's exactly what I need. It doesn't really work if for instance it is a restaurant and you need to have waiters, dishwashers and cooks round the clock as patrons visit your establishment. If they'd rather work fewer hours and get less money, who am I to argue? I'm just saying they'll be poorer for it and contrary to what you posited, they won't be too happy about it either. |
|
Programming really isn't about hours but about the quality of those hours.
For manual labor things are of course entirely different. But I'm not talking about manual labor.
(Of course, in some companies, programming is seen as a kind of manual labor where people naively assume that hours spent working translates in some linear fashion. To quote something an executive at a large company said in a meeting: "I don't understand how there can be more productive programmers and less productive...they're just writing code, right? So any developer is interchangeable with any other, right?".)